Yada Yahweh Email help@yadayahweh.com
if you encounter any problems.
Join us at PalTalk:
Study Group Education/Study Groups/YY Study Group
Free Trial of Paltalk
Welcome GuestHome | Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

why 'erets is not Earth Options · View
James
#1 Posted : Tuesday, January 03, 2012 4:22:49 PM
Rank: Moderator



Joined: 10/23/2007
Posts: 1,788
Points: 3,838
Location: Texas
I was working on some translations today and came across a perfect example of why the Christian view of the flood is errant.

If 'erets is the Earth as Christians are want to say it is concerning the flood, then this verse is God telling Ya'aqob to leave the Earth he is in and return to the Earth of his relatives.

Ba'reshiyth 31:13
Now (attah) stand up (qum – rise up), go (yatsa’ - depart) from this land (‘erets – region and area) and return (suwb – come back and be restored) to the land (‘erets – region and area) of your relatives (‘atah moledeth - your kin and family, your birthplace and origins).
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.
flintface
#2 Posted : Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:37:26 PM
Rank: Advanced Member



Joined: 1/19/2010
Posts: 512
Points: 1,557
Location: WA - The Evergreen State
And, since no spacecraft is mentioned, it is obvious that Ya'aqob was into advanced teleporting. So why don't all those televangelists and megachurch "pastors" teleport the heck outta here?!
Theophilus
#3 Posted : Friday, January 06, 2012 8:58:24 AM
Rank: Advanced Member


Joined: 7/5/2007
Posts: 674
Points: 1,363
James you make a good case, although I doubt most would casual Christians would question the popular translations enough to examine the underlying Hebrew texts , figuring the translators must have it right since it is reinforced by relegious authorities and is rarely questioned.

What puzzles me, is why Erets has so many plausible meanings dependig on what the context is. I recently was discussing Genesis chapter one with a few Christians and wish to share the amplified YY rendering of the chapter and realize that Erets is conveyed as the material universe as well which I wish a more specific Hebrew word was available to make the distictions: region, land, planet Earth, all physical matter. While I think YY has it correct, I wish that we could more definity make it apparent to a sincere seeker of Yah's truth.

Respectfully,

-Theophilus
Yah Tselem
#4 Posted : Friday, January 06, 2012 10:20:39 AM
Rank: Member



Joined: 3/13/2008
Posts: 205
Points: 408
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Easier said than done. It seems that with most all Hebrew words, there are many definitions, and in some cases there is even kind of opposite definitions. As an example, look at the word:

kabed – very significant and valuable, worthy and massive, distinguished and honorable, glorified and rewarding, numerous, burdensome, weighty, voluminous, troubling, grievous, severe, harsh.

So is it valuable or is it troubling and grievous??

I have come to find that translating is an art, not a science.

Context Context Context

Also, specific to Erets... a good point to make is that if Yah had wanted to say that the water would flood the “world,” rather than land or region, He would have used tebel. It means “world” as in the “habitable portion of the planet.”
Theophilus
#5 Posted : Friday, January 06, 2012 11:08:06 AM
Rank: Advanced Member


Joined: 7/5/2007
Posts: 674
Points: 1,363
FWIW, I agree with you YT, that trnsalting does indeed seem to be more of an art than a science, but wish that were otherwise.

From my recent early Genesis conversations, it seems to me that people who view Adam as the first humanoid, vey often need a global flood event, while a first human with a neshamah permits a vast regional flood to accomplish the what it appears to me to the texts say occur. I'm not sure if these are abosultely tied, but seems to be the trend. Also the young earth global flood position seems to me to more supported by the popular translations, while the first with neshamah, targeted flood may require amplified Hebrew renderings.

Respectfully,

-Theophilus
lassie1865
#6 Posted : Saturday, January 07, 2012 2:20:38 PM
Rank: Member



Joined: 2/18/2008
Posts: 271
Points: 537
Location: Colorado
Someone posted a link to the internet here on the forum within the last month--I can't remember what the subject was; can someone refresh my memory?

Thanks
Yah Tselem
#7 Posted : Saturday, January 07, 2012 3:11:05 PM
Rank: Member



Joined: 3/13/2008
Posts: 205
Points: 408
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Theo, just want to say I complete agree with that. That does seem to be the trend. Also, it seems to me that most people who believe in young earth and Adam being the first human tend to be the same ones who don't care about amplified Hebrew renderings because they have enough faith to believe whatever their preacher tells them. I find it to be a waste of time to even talk about it with that sort of folk until I stumble across one that is actually searching for the unbiased truth.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

YAFVision Theme by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by YAF 1.9.301 | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.115 seconds.